Tuesday, 29/09/2026

Evaluating Burnham’s Devolution Strategy: The Need for Accountability

As the landscape of English devolution transforms, concerns over accountability are becoming increasingly pronounced. Andy Burnham has voiced his discontent with what he describes as Britain’s “unaccountable state,” emphasizing the disconnect between powerful institutions…

Share:

As the landscape of English devolution transforms, concerns over accountability are becoming increasingly pronounced. Andy Burnham has voiced his discontent with what he describes as Britain’s “unaccountable state,” emphasizing the disconnect between powerful institutions and the daily lives of citizens. His vision for increased authority and funding for mayors across England presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in a political climate where oversight of local governance has significantly diminished.

The decline of essential accountability frameworks is evident in the wake of the 2015 dissolution of the Audit Commission, a move orchestrated by then-Prime Minister David Cameron. This decision was part of a broader effort to reduce governmental oversight, yet it has left a vacuum in the understanding of local government expenditures. The consequences have been dire; councils faced with financial constraints have resorted to selling assets and engaging in precarious financial ventures, leading to a series of high-profile bankruptcies and controversies.

Recent incidents, such as the financial collapse of several councils and the troubling revelations surrounding the Teesworks project, highlight the risks associated with a lack of transparency. A government report published in 2024 criticized the excessive secrecy surrounding the development led by Conservative mayor Ben Houchen, underscoring the urgent need for mechanisms that ensure local governments remain accountable to their constituents.